Hi Maya, I made a lightweight spreadsheet for comparing rep ramp time, quota coverage and hiring scenarios. Happy to send it over if useful.
Test more ideas without spending more leads.
Unpitch simulates buyer reactions to your outreach, helping you refine your audience, offer, and message before launching a campaign.
See your offer through your buyer’s eyes.
Outbound sequence test
3 steps · last edit just now
Here’s the spreadsheet I mentioned. You can change the assumptions directly.
Would you be open to a 20-minute walkthrough next week?
The first two touches earn cautious interest. Step 3 asks for a meeting before the buyer has acted.
Step 1What reduced friction
Low frictionA concrete resource offered without asking for commitment.
Step 2Interest stays tentative
WatchUseful, but still only tentative interest.
Step 3Meeting ask comes too early
HighIt asks for commitment before interest exists.
Would you be open to a 20-minute walkthrough next week?
Persona Reaction
Simulated result
Disengages
Step 3 turns a useful resource into a meeting ask before the buyer has shown interest.
A modelled VP Sales segment reads a three-step cold email sequence. The first two touches offer a practical capacity-planning sheet. The reaction shifts when Step 3 asks for a meeting before the segment has shown interest.
Trusted by
Know what to improve.
Find the vague promise, the generic opener or the ask that feels too big. See the exact words behind each finding and what needs attention.
Get started
Audience Simulation
See who connects with your offer.
Test your campaign across buyer types before you send it.
Get startedSandbox campaign
Demand Generation Director
Protecting a thin Q4 pipeline
50%
Revenue Operations Lead
Repairing unreliable pipeline forecasts
30%
Finance Director
Scrutinizing new spend during planning
20%
Patterns by message
Reported barriers and the text that triggered them
Unclear business payoff
Message 2
separates weak relevance, unclear value, trust gaps, and reply effort
Broad timing claim for Finance
Message 1
teams often find late in the quarter
Reply effort
Message 2
Is that relevant to your pipeline review this month?
Resistance to the approach
Message 3
Last note from me.
Credibility concerns
Message 1
simulated buyers
Unclear business payoff
Message 3
the short walkthrough
Positive patterns
Reported positive reactions and the text that triggered them
Low-pressure close
Message 3
no reply needed and I will close the loop
Exact text to revise
Message 2
preserves the exact sentence that caused each reaction
Inspectable evidence
Message 2
inspect the evidence instead of taking a score on faith
Visible sequence drop-off
Message 1
shows where simulated buyers stop reading
Next tests
Abstract payoff and reply work
Message 2 · All personas
Both: Unclear business payoff and Reply effort
Would naming one pipeline decision before the reply question reduce the overlapping barriers?
Broad timing claim for Finance
Message 1 · Finance Director · Scrutinizing new spend during planning
Broad timing claim for Finance
Would connecting the opening to spend scrutiny reduce first-message relevance objections?
Model a buyer segment in a changing market.
Researched Personas combine segment evidence, market shifts, tools, alternatives and switching forces to show what feels timely, expected or irrelevant.
What already works stays in the model.

We train models to predict human reactions.
Trained on 40 billion human response records.
Write it in Claude Code. Test it in Unpitch.
Improve your outreach with feedback from simulated buyers, right in Claude Code.
Connect to Claude Code›Check this draft with Unpitch and help me improve it.
Checking your draft with Unpitch
Looking for weak spots in your message
“Best-in-class platform” reads as inflated next to the specific customer proof.
When the message carries your name, your team or your client.
For founders
Protect a first impression you cannot get back.
Choose the buyer. See the reaction. Fix the message before it reaches a real lead.
Get startedFor sales leaders
Catch the weak touch before a team repeats it.
Review a rep’s full sequence, find where it loses momentum and return evidence for revision.
Get startedFor agencies
Don’t burn client leads on weak campaigns.
Win client trust with campaigns tested on simulated buyers before they reach real leads.
Explore Unpitch for agenciesPricing
Start individual. Scale when the workflow earns it.
Compare the Individual launch plans. Business is the second release.
Free
One meaningful test
Lite
Recurring Quality Checks
Plus
Most popularComplete individual workflow
Pro
Unlimited Researched Personas
FAQ
How Unpitch works.
Buyer reactions, audience tests and getting started in plain language.
See how it lands. Before you send.
Get started

